* Stephen Smalley (sds(a)epoch.ncsc.mil) wrote:
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 15:29, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Sort of. It fixes the one you saw. However, the corruption Peter was chasing
> is probably not related. This was a userspace fix. I think there is a
> separate kernel side one that's been discussed in the SE Linux mail list.
Yes, we saw corruption in the SELinux avc messages prior to any use of
auditd at all, when everything was still being handled by klogd.
Ah, I missed that, thanks.
-chris
--
Linux Security Modules
http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net