Re: [RFC][PATCH] collect security labels on user processes generating audit messages
On Thursday 16 February 2006 10:29, Stephen Smalley wrote:
Except for what other code should do about NULL pointers in output.
If
they defer it to vsnprintf, they will end up with <NULL> in the output.
So should Tim's code be checking for !ctx and outputting (null) there as
well?
Yes, I think that would be consistent will all the other audit code.
-Steve