Hello.
Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > On 14/09/28, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > (Q2) Does auxiliary record work with only type=SYSCALL case?
> >
> > Auxiliary records don't work with AUDIT_LOGIN because that record has a
> > NULL context. Similarly for core dumps (AUDIT_ANOM_ABEND), AUDIT_SECCOMP,
> > configuration changes (AUDIT_CONFIG_CHANGE, AUDIT_FEATURE_CHANGE), most
> > (all?) AUDIT_USER_* messages.
> >
> I see, thank you.
>
> Although I feel that, from the point of view of troubleshooting, emitting
> history of thread's comm name into NULL-context records would help sysadmin
> to map login session and operations a user did from that login session,
> I'm OK with starting history of thread's comm name as auxiliary records
> (i.e. not emitted into NULL-context records).
>
> Adding LKML for reviewers. What else can I do for merging this patch?
I'm willing to take it with some reflection and no significant
objections, in particular from userspace audit. I'll have a closer look
at it.
Any comments on this patch?