Audit ipset changes? - Linux-audit - Linux-Audit List Archives

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Audit ipset changes?

auditd daemon is changing /tmp...

Getting the value of a syscall's...

Andreas Hasenack

Friday, 26 February 2021 Fri, 26 Feb '21

12:21 p.m.

Hi, is there a way to audit ipset changes? The closest I got was to log the specific "socket(AF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW, NETLINK_NETFILTER)" call that ipset makes, but that obviously also triggers read-only operations like "ipset list", and any other app that opens suck a socket.

Attachments:

attachment.html (text/html — 668 bytes)

Reply

Show replies by date

Richard Guy Briggs

Saturday, 27 February Sat, 27 Feb

3:19 p.m.

On 2021-02-26 15:21, Andreas Hasenack wrote:

Hi,

Hi Andreas,

is there a way to audit ipset changes? The closest I got was to log the specific "socket(AF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW, NETLINK_NETFILTER)" call that ipset makes, but that obviously also triggers read-only operations like "ipset list", and any other app that opens suck a socket.

Issue ghak124 (https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/124) introduced auditing for nftables modifications. It turns out it was far too verbose but may have listed these actions for the iptables-nft variant. That is about to be trimmed but should still catch any changes for nftables. What parameters do you wish to have logged? At a quick look, I'm guessing table doesn't make sense since a set could be used by any registered table? But the set name would, followed by protocol family, number of items changed, and the operation name? How much life does iptables have to it? Given that this command can change the configuration of iptables (and ipv6tables, ebtables,...) it would seem this this should be logged. Steve? - RGB -- Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com> Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada IRC: rgb, SunRaycer Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635

Reply

Andreas Hasenack

Wednesday, 3 March Wed, 3 Mar

8:53 a.m.

Hello, On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 6:19 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com> wrote:

On 2021-02-26 15:21, Andreas Hasenack wrote: Issue ghak124 (https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/124) introduced auditing for nftables modifications. It turns out it was far too verbose but may have listed these actions for the iptables-nft variant. That is about to be trimmed but should still catch any changes for nftables. What parameters do you wish to have logged? At a quick look, I'm guessing table doesn't make sense since a set could be used by any registered table? But the set name would, followed by protocol family, number of items changed, and the operation name?

I'm not sure if there are regulatory requirements about what has to be logged in this case, but yeah, what caught my eye is that a firewall rule can effectively be changed by just changing the ipset it references, and that change didn't trigger a NETFILTER_CFG audit message. This is with iptables, not nftables. I don't know if it's handled differently with nftables.

How much life does iptables have to it? Given that this command can

You mean for how long will people still be using iptables? I'm not sure, but I personally bet in a few more years.

change the configuration of iptables (and ipv6tables, ebtables,...) it would seem this this should be logged.

That was my thinking, but I thought about a log of its own, not part of iptables. To be honest I haven't checked yet what changes in NETFILTER_CFG with nftables, if anything. I know custom rules catching setsockopt won't catch nftables changes, but that's about it.

Reply

1606

days inactive

1611

days old

linux-audit@lists.linux-audit.osci.io

Manage subscription

2 comments

2 participants

tags (0)

participants (2)

Andreas Hasenack
Richard Guy Briggs