On Tuesday 20 September 2005 12:22, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
Any other [less] confusing suggestions.
kernel/auditfo.c for file object ?
kernel/auditf.c just f for file
kernel/fsaudit.c switch 'em around
Or are people happy with this?
I don't think it belongs in fs directory as its not a filesystem. Also giving
it the audit.c name will make us ask which one each time we talk about
audit.c
To ease the pain of getting this upstream, eliminating confusion
where
possible seems to make sense.
Sounds reasonable to change the name to draw less criticism. Please don't call
it audit.c.
-Steve