On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:30:41 -0700
Peter Moody <pmoody(a)google.com> wrote:
> Additionally it looks like audit_free_names might return too early when
> AUDIT_DEBUG was set to 2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Moody <pmoody(a)google.com>
> ---
> kernel/auditsc.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
> index 4b96415..0c1db46 100644
> --- a/kernel/auditsc.c
> +++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
> @@ -997,6 +997,7 @@ static inline void audit_free_names(struct audit_context
*context)
>
> #if AUDIT_DEBUG == 2
> if (context->put_count + context->ino_count != context->name_count) {
> + int i = 0;
> printk(KERN_ERR "%s:%d(:%d): major=%d in_syscall=%d"
> " name_count=%d put_count=%d"
> " ino_count=%d [NOT freeing]\n",
> @@ -1005,11 +1006,10 @@ static inline void audit_free_names(struct audit_context
*context)
> context->name_count, context->put_count,
> context->ino_count);
> list_for_each_entry(n, &context->names_list, list) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "names[%d] = %p = %s\n", i,
> + printk(KERN_ERR "names[%d] = %p = %s\n", i++,
> n->name, n->name ?: "(null)");
> }
> dump_stack();
> - return;
> }
I'm not certain what the intent of this code was, but if you remove the
"return" above, then the printk above it that says "[NOT FREEING]".
Will
no longer be valid.
Oh, good point. I was going from what I presumed the intent to be from
the comment from above __audit_syscall_exit
/**
* Tear down after system call. If the audit context has been marked as
* auditable (either because of the AUDIT_RECORD_CONTEXT state from
* filtering, or because some other part of the kernel wrote an audit
* message), then write out the syscall information. In call cases,
* free the names stored from getname().
*/
(and I am assuming that 'in call cases' is a typo for 'in all cases')
The other thing is that my testing indicated that my box hung if
audit_free_names returned right there.
I need to wait for Eric anyway; hopefully he'll be able to shed some light.
Cheers,
peter
> #endif
> #if AUDIT_DEBUG
> @@ -2084,10 +2084,10 @@ void audit_putname(const char *name)
> __FILE__, __LINE__, context->serial, name);
> if (context->name_count) {
> struct audit_names *n;
> - int i;
> + int i = 0;
>
> list_for_each_entry(n, &context->names_list, list)
> - printk(KERN_ERR "name[%d] = %p = %s\n", i,
> + printk(KERN_ERR "name[%d] = %p = %s\n", i++,
> n->name, n->name ?: "(null)");
> }
> #endif
--
Peter Moody Google 1.650.253.7306
Security Engineer pgp:0xC3410038