On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:15:50PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote: > On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 10:11 +0800, zhangxiliang wrote: > > When the "status_get->mask" is "AUDIT_STATUS_RATE_LIMIT || AUDIT_STATUS_BACKLOG_LIMIT". > > If "audit_set_rate_limit" fails and "audit_set_backlog_limit" succeeds, the "err" value will be greater than or equal to 0. It will miss the failure of rate set. > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiliang <zhangxiliang(a)cn.fujitsu.com&gt; > > man, it gives me the heebee jeebies with the coding style but it follows > everything else Sanitized, applied, pushed to audit-current (audit.b53)