10:07 a.m.
I was playing around and wanted to know if there is plans to allow audit rule filters by
TTY, or specifically filter when tty != (none) (i.e. interactive login events).
11:56 a.m.
On Friday, April 26, 2013 10:07:56 AM John Bambenek wrote:
I was playing around and wanted to know if there is plans to allow
audit
rule filters by TTY, or specifically filter when tty != (none) (i.e.
interactive login events).
You can use the pam_tty_audit module to do that. There are no plans to
configure this by auditctl.
-Steve
12:03 p.m.
I would prefer a solution besides a keylogger that, among other things, happily captures
passwords and stores them in the clear in logs.
On Apr 26, 2013, at 11:56 AM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Friday, April 26, 2013 10:07:56 AM John Bambenek wrote:
> I was playing around and wanted to know if there is plans to allow audit
> rule filters by TTY, or specifically filter when tty != (none) (i.e.
> interactive login events).
You can use the pam_tty_audit module to do that. There are no plans to
configure this by auditctl.
-Steve
12:14 p.m.
On Friday, April 26, 2013 12:03:17 PM John Bambenek wrote:
I would prefer a solution besides a keylogger that, among other
things,
happily captures passwords and stores them in the clear in logs.
That is being worked on:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2013-March/msg00050.html
The patch still isn't ready, but it will be configured by pam_tty_audit.
-Steve
On Apr 26, 2013, at 11:56 AM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> On Friday, April 26, 2013 10:07:56 AM John Bambenek wrote:
>> I was playing around and wanted to know if there is plans to allow audit
>> rule filters by TTY, or specifically filter when tty != (none) (i.e.
>> interactive login events).
>
> You can use the pam_tty_audit module to do that. There are no plans to
> configure this by auditctl.
>
> -Steve
12:27 p.m.
Even better. Thanks.
On Apr 26, 2013, at 12:14 PM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Friday, April 26, 2013 12:03:17 PM John Bambenek wrote:
> I would prefer a solution besides a keylogger that, among other things,
> happily captures passwords and stores them in the clear in logs.
That is being worked on:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2013-March/msg00050.html
The patch still isn't ready, but it will be configured by pam_tty_audit.
-Steve
> On Apr 26, 2013, at 11:56 AM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Friday, April 26, 2013 10:07:56 AM John Bambenek wrote:
>>> I was playing around and wanted to know if there is plans to allow audit
>>> rule filters by TTY, or specifically filter when tty != (none) (i.e.
>>> interactive login events).
>>
>> You can use the pam_tty_audit module to do that. There are no plans to
>> configure this by auditctl.
>>
>> -Steve
4257
days inactive
4257
days old
linux-audit@lists.linux-audit.osci.io
4 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
John Bambenek -
Steve Grubb