On Thursday 03 November 2005 09:26, Amy Griffis wrote:
> auditctl -E "type=IPC" -E "type>1400"
Using the hard numbers is not a good idea.
This is just an illustration. Besides, we have to support numbers as we may be
using old user space tools and new kernel.
We want to abstract that
from the user. It would be better to define an alias that comprises
an event group. For example:
auditctl -E user
would exclude any messages in the range AUDIT_FIRST_USER_MSG to
AUDIT_LAST_USER_MSG.
Aahh, but there is a collision in that audit_user is a valid message type.
This would be confusing, too.
Providing the capability to exclude single messages or larger groups
of messages should suffice. I don't think it benefits the user to
support the >,< operators in this case.
But it calls the comparator function, so we can support these operators for
free.
Additionally, I don't think it makes sense to support the
exclusion of
any single message type defined in the header file.
I think we should let users decide for themselves. We cannot know every
situation or reason for doing things. Why prevent someone that knows what
they want?
-Steve