On Wednesday 15 June 2005 10:44, Loulwa Salem wrote:
Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 June 2005 11:28, Loulwa Salem wrote:
>
>>Anybody can think of a way to go around this and still test the
>>=PATH_MAX, and =PATH_MAX-1 cases?
>
>
> Are you trying to create a dirname that is 4085 bytes long? dirs are limited
> to 255 bytes for their name. You will have to create a series of dirs to get
> the right length. Is this what you are doing?
Ah ... I was trying to create one really long directory ...
I think at some point I thought of doing what you suggested ... but
disregarded it because I thought it would be a pain to cascade
directories ...
No pain, no gain, Loulwa =)
-tim
Thanks for the help Steve
- Loulwa
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit(a)redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit