source code control for audit userspace tools
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
I brought this up on #audit but the conversation didn't go anywhere.
It would be nice if there could be some form of source code control for
the changes that occur between revisions of the userspace tools.
Is development internally to RedHat done using any form of source code
control? Or is the development more ad-hoq?
Full public source code control would perhaps be beneficial in terms of
fostering community development. Failing this, just having the diffs
per discret change included in each release would be very helpful.
Possible?
Thanks
Tony
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 19:06:08 Tony Jones wrote:
It would be nice if there could be some form of source code control
for
the changes that occur between revisions of the userspace tools.
Maybe in 2 weeks I'll look for a place to put it. I have some tight deadlines
that I might miss if I get distracted right now. I'm not opposed to the
idea...just not right now. :)
-Steve
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:06:08 PST, Tony Jones said:
It would be nice if there could be some form of source code control
for
the changes that occur between revisions of the userspace tools.
Is development internally to RedHat done using any form of source code
control? Or is the development more ad-hoq?
A publicly accessible git tree would be nice. :)
(Of course, that's only if 'git' is the native storage, or if there's a
per-commit export to it - a git repository that has a changelog that
reads 'import 1.1.3', 'import 1.1.4', etc isn't much help....)
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:44:29AM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks(a)vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:06:08 PST, Tony Jones said:
> It would be nice if there could be some form of source code control for
> the changes that occur between revisions of the userspace tools.
>
> Is development internally to RedHat done using any form of source code
> control? Or is the development more ad-hoq?
A publicly accessible git tree would be nice. :)
(Of course, that's only if 'git' is the native storage, or if there's a
per-commit export to it - a git repository that has a changelog that
reads 'import 1.1.3', 'import 1.1.4', etc isn't much help....)
Right, it needs to be per discrete change (feature and bugfix) which clearly
may have an impact on how internal development is done.
I don't care if it's git, svn, cvs or just a directory per release containing
a set of discrete patches.
Unless there is some scc inside of redhat, I'm guessing it's too late for
past releases and this will just be for going forward.
Thanks!
Tony
6519
days inactive
6519
days old
linux-audit@lists.linux-audit.osci.io
3 comments
3 participants
tags (0)
participants (3)
-
Steve Grubb -
Tony Jones -
Valdis.Kletnieks＠vt.edu