On 2018-07-20 11:35, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
This came about while trying to determine if there would be any
pattern
match on contid, a new audit container identifier internal variable.
Thsi was the only one.
Yikes, my own typing needs a check... and I notice another spelling
mistake in the following line "contition".
Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com>
---
net/rfkill/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/rfkill/core.c b/net/rfkill/core.c
index 59d0eb9..e89a009 100644
--- a/net/rfkill/core.c
+++ b/net/rfkill/core.c
@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ void rfkill_remove_epo_lock(void)
/**
* rfkill_is_epo_lock_active - returns true EPO is active
*
- * Returns 0 (false) if there is NOT an active EPO contidion,
+ * Returns 0 (false) if there is NOT an active EPO condition,
* and 1 (true) if there is an active EPO contition, which
* locks all radios in one of the BLOCKED states.
*
--
1.8.3.1
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com>
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635