Re: auditctl usage for filter lists: "user" , "watch" and "exclude"
Steve Grubb wrote:
On Thursday 18 May 2006 12:04, Michael C Thompson wrote:
> So then it should be safe to say that having two -F msgtype=... is an
> invalid construct for a rule? Since messages have only 1 type?
Only if they are using the '=' operator. Other operators might be valid to
have multiple -F msgtype.
Ah yes, good point. I'll be sure to properly test the relational
operators. Other than the source code, is there any place for a user to
go and get the message types to determine their ordering?
Mike