Re: [redhat-lspp] [PATCH] promiscuous mode

On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 08:39 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote: Looking at this printk(KERN_INFO ...) and audit_log(...). As long as it's just a small handful of isolated anomalous events that we need to feed to the audit subsystem, I think we'll be okay. But if we start following lots of printk(KERN_INFO ...) calls with audit_log(...) calls, we should probably consider if the printk() should just do the audit_log() if some auditing flag has been raised. This isn't bothering me yet, but something to think about if there are dozens of places in the kernel that start calling printk and audit_log. :-Dustin -- Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland(a)us.ibm.com&gt;