On 14/12/10, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 21:11 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 09, 2014 03:37:07 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > Since both ppc and ppc64 have LE variants which are now reported by uname,
> > add that flag (__AUDIT_ARCH_LE) to syscall_get_arch() and add
> > AUDIT_ARCH_PPC64LE variant.
> >
> > Without this, perf trace and auditctl fail.
> >
> > Mainline kernel reports ppc64le (per a058801) but there is no matching
> > AUDIT_ARCH_PPC64LE.
> >
> > Since 32-bit PPC LE is not supported by audit, don't advertise it in
> > AUDIT_ARCH_PPC* variants.
> >
> > See:
> >
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-August/msg00082.html
> >
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-December/msg00004.html
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscall.h | 6 +++++-
> > include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> The audit changes look fine to me, but as I mentioned earlier, this should go
> in via the ppc tree and not the audit tree.
>
> Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul(a)paul-moore.com>
Thanks.
Yep I'll take it via the powerpc tree, I'll CC stable as well as presumably we
want this to work in all versions that had LE support.
Yes, please!
(I was very tempted to change the #error to #warning, but figured the
placeholder comment in the uapi file was sufficient.)
cheers
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs(a)redhat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545