On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 11:35 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Question: Would it be sane for Tim to go ahead and re-base his
patch to
> the latest -mm and submit his RFC on linux-fsdevel now even before
> resolving the userspace interface issue?
I would tentatively say yes. It may take a few days to finalize the list
watches. (Changing this structure the first step.) Hopefully, dumping the
whole list without a path doesn't change the underlying design in any
significant way. If dumping the whole list will change the design, we may
need to hold off depending on what the changes involve.
Even if it requires significant internal changes to auditfs, I don't
think it will have any impact on the hooks in the VFS, which is
primarily what we need to get feedback on from linux-fsdevel.
--
Stephen Smalley <sds(a)tycho.nsa.gov>
National Security Agency