On Saturday 23 April 2005 05:09, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
Hello,
This is an updated patch with the spinlock correctly defined. I'm assuming
both oops Stephen reported were the same one (since the spinlock would be
used in both cases).
I should also note, that I compiled the kernel SMP on my UP box and gave it a
test (no oopes). Hopefully this solves that problem.
-tim