Re: [PATCH] filesystem location based auditing
On Monday 27 February 2006 11:30, Amy Griffis wrote:
The last patch I posted was supposed to replace audit-string-2.patch
I must have missed that in the text somewhere...
(as audit-watch.patch or something similar). I think if you used
the
git tree ordering, you wouldn't see as many patch collisions.
At this point, your patch is the last one in, so shouldn't it should be
against what's already in the tree? Its really a lot of trouble to take a
change in a patch that's in the middle of the stack.
-Steve