Re: [PATCH] audit: file system auditing based on location and name

> > Ultimately, the part where we differ most, is the processing of information in > > fs/dcache.c to give dynamic updates in response to file system activity (such > > as attaching audit information to an auditable file whose inode just changed). > > I believe this should be kept seperate and not part of this framework nor Inotify. > > It's a specific requirement for audit, but not for Inotify. This is one of the places > > the two systems are functionally different. > > I don't think it should be different. If inotify wants to just ignore > this information, it can. Doesn't this mentality bring with it the risk of bloating a framework that should be as "trim" as possible?