Re: [PATCH] audit: use the proper gfp flags in the audit_log_nfcfg() calls
On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 4:26 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 2020-07-03 09:36, Paul Moore wrote:
> Commit 142240398e50 ("audit: add gfp parameter to audit_log_nfcfg")
> incorrectly passed gfp flags to audit_log_nfcfg() which were not
> consistent with the calling function, this commit fixes that.
>
> Fixes: 142240398e50 ("audit: add gfp parameter to audit_log_nfcfg")
> Reported-by: Jones Desougi <jones.desougi+netfilter(a)gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul(a)paul-moore.com>
Looks good to me. For what it's worth:
Thanks, applied to audit/next. Also, for the record, reviews are
always welcome; I really dislike merging my own patches without
reviews. Sometimes it needs to be done to fix a serious fault, build
error, etc. but in general I'm of the opinion that maintainer patches
should be treated just the same as any other patch.
Reviewed-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com>
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com