Re: [PATCH V6 05/10] audit: log creation and deletion of namespace instances
On Thursday, May 14, 2015 09:10:56 PM Oren Laadan wrote:
[focusing on "containers id" - snipped the rest away]
I am unfamiliar with the audit subsystem, but work with namespaces in other
contexts. Perhaps the term "container" is overloaded here. The definition
suggested by Steve in this thread makes sense to me: "a combination of
namespaces". I imagine people may want to audit subsets of namespaces.
For namespaces, can use a string like "A:B:C:D:E:F" as an identifier for a
particular combination, where A-F are respective namespaces identifiers.
(Can be taken for example from /proc/PID/ns/{mnt,uts,ipc,user,pid,net}).
That will even be grep-able to locate records related to a particular
subset
of namespaces. So a "container" in the classic meaning would have all A-F
unique and different from the init process, but processes separated only by
e.g. mnt-ns and net-ns will differ from the init process in A and F.
(If a string is a no go, then perhaps combine the IDs in a unique way into a
super ID).
As has been mentioned in every other email in this thread, the kernel has no
concept of a container, it is a userspace idea and trying to generate a
meaningful value in the kernel is a mistake in my opinion. My current opinion
is that we allow userspace to set a container ID token as it sees fit and the
kernel will just use the value provided by userspace.
--
paul moore
security @ redhat