Re: audit.50 kernel
On Thursday 26 May 2005 10:07, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 10:06 -0500, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
> Ok, well... I should just defer my changes to this kernel then since we're
> going to have to go with the hash table anyway. Thanks for doing this by the
> way.
I didn't merge the patches though -- I can still apply the hash table
thing afterwards. I was sort of expecting to have to keep that separate.
Well... you're building RPMs with the hash table stuff... so did you want to branch?
Because I need to be able to test and fix bugs so that I can submit to LKML. Maybe
I'm not following ya. You want one implementation (the hash table) for Redhat-only
kernels and a separate (i_audit) implementation for mainline?
-tim