On Wednesday 05 December 2007 2:45:12 pm Paul Moore wrote:
Hello all,
I'm looking at RFC4303 at some of the auditing requirements and one of the
gaps between what the specification requires and what we currently provide
involves the SA's sequence number and the IPv6 flow ID. According the list
of existing audit fields[1] there doesn't appear to any fields which are a
good match. With that in mind I'd like to propose two new fields:
* seqno - sequence number
* flowid - flow id
Scratch the 'flowid' name, the more I look at things we should probably go
with 'flowlbl'.
--
paul moore
linux security @ hp