Re: Opinion please

On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 16:55 -0500, Timothy R. Chavez wrote: > > But I'm not sure whether netlink_unicast is a problem (sure looks like > > it - it puts current on a waitqueue for one thing) or what you should > > do about it. You might just need to build a list of things to send > > under the rcu_read_lock(), then send each element once you > > rcu_read_unlock(). > > Ok, I took this advice, and just went ahead and implemented something > very similar. Good idea Serge. Thanks. Yeah, that seems sanest to me. > (plus I'm going to patch up to rc4-mm2). Please don't do that. At this point in time we really need you to be working directly on the 2.6.9 RPM kernel primarily. Work on the audit.39 kernel which was just uploaded to the yum repository.