Re: [PATCH] TaskTracker : Simplified thread information tracker.
Steve Grubb wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 10:02:44 +0900
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel(a)I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> wrote:
> May I continue proposing this functionality?
From the audit perspective, sure. I think we were expecting a revised
patch after the comments. Other groups may have different thoughts,
though.
-Steve
OK, thank you. Before posting a revised patch, can I hear answers about
specification questions listed below?
(Q1) Where can I find which bytes in $value need to be escaped when
emitting a record like name='$value' ? Is 0x20 in $value permitted?
(Q2) Does auxiliary record work with only type=SYSCALL case?
Regards.