On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 21:11 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
 On Tuesday, December 09, 2014 03:37:07 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
 > Since both ppc and ppc64 have LE variants which are now reported by uname,
 > add that flag (__AUDIT_ARCH_LE) to syscall_get_arch() and add
 > AUDIT_ARCH_PPC64LE variant.
 > 
 > Without this,  perf trace and auditctl fail.
 > 
 > Mainline kernel reports ppc64le (per a058801) but there is no matching
 > AUDIT_ARCH_PPC64LE.
 > 
 > Since 32-bit PPC LE is not supported by audit, don't advertise it in
 > AUDIT_ARCH_PPC* variants.
 > 
 > See:
 > 	
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-August/msg00082.html
 > 	
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-December/msg00004.html
 > 
 > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com>
 > ---
 >  arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscall.h |    6 +++++-
 >  include/uapi/linux/audit.h         |    2 ++
 >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
 
 The audit changes look fine to me, but as I mentioned earlier, this should go 
 in via the ppc tree and not the audit tree.
 
 Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul(a)paul-moore.com> 
Thanks.
Yep I'll take it via the powerpc tree, I'll CC stable as well as presumably we
want this to work in all versions that had LE support.
cheers