On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 21:11 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
On Tuesday, December 09, 2014 03:37:07 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> Since both ppc and ppc64 have LE variants which are now reported by uname,
> add that flag (__AUDIT_ARCH_LE) to syscall_get_arch() and add
> AUDIT_ARCH_PPC64LE variant.
>
> Without this, perf trace and auditctl fail.
>
> Mainline kernel reports ppc64le (per a058801) but there is no matching
> AUDIT_ARCH_PPC64LE.
>
> Since 32-bit PPC LE is not supported by audit, don't advertise it in
> AUDIT_ARCH_PPC* variants.
>
> See:
>
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-August/msg00082.html
>
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-December/msg00004.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscall.h | 6 +++++-
> include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
The audit changes look fine to me, but as I mentioned earlier, this should go
in via the ppc tree and not the audit tree.
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul(a)paul-moore.com>
Thanks.
Yep I'll take it via the powerpc tree, I'll CC stable as well as presumably we
want this to work in all versions that had LE support.
cheers