Re: [PATCH ghak122 v1] audit: store event sockaddr in case of no rules
On 7/13/2020 5:11 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 7:09 PM Casey Schaufler
<casey(a)schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
> ... but it does appear that I could switch to using your audit_alloc_local().
In my opinion, linking the audit container ID and LSM stacking
patchsets would seem like a very big mistake, especially since the
consolidation you are describing could be done after the fact without
any disruption to the kernel/userspace interface. I would strongly
encourage both patchsets to remain self-contained if at all possible
so as to not jeopardize each other.
Whatever helps the review/ack process best works for me. I will leave
audit_stamp_context() as is unless there is other feedback that leads
it to be changed.