On 10/22/2014 03:44 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
We haven't changed anything yet, but I strongly believe we need
to do away
with field ordering. The good news is that if you explicitly search for the
field instead of relying on a fixed order the code should be more robust and
work either way. ;)
I have no doubt my old code looks like Steve's first
example, not the
second.
But as I said, code can be changed if the assumptions about ordering are
thrown out.
You're making a pretty big splash over here Paul! Very impressive...
:-)
LCB
--
LC (Lenny) Bruzenak
lenny(a)magitekltd.com