On Monday, August 10, 2015 12:53:54 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On 15/08/10, Paul Moore wrote:
> I'm still not convinced that we need to merge exe child filtering patch so
> I'm not going to apply this, or your v10 patch, at this point in time.
> If you want to hold on to the code in case you and/or Steve think you can
> convince me at a later date, you might as well merge this fixup patch
> into the v10 patch.
I fixed the known problems and reposted it for reference and public
archive so that it wasn't buried privately in my tree.
No problem, that's smart. I just wanted to respond so that there wasn't any
confusion about the status of this patch; I figure everybody who takes the
time to post a patch deserves a response, even if it is "no thanks".
Aside from the need for the child filtering patch, do the RCU
treatments
here look reasonable?
Yep, it looks reasonable to me.
--
paul moore
security @ redhat