On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 04:47:17PM -0700, Mark Moseley wrote:
> BTW, what makes you think that container's root is even
reachable from
> "the host's /"? There is no such thing as "root of the OS
itself"; different
> processes can (and in case of containers definitely do) run in different
> namespaces. With entirely different filesystems mounted in those, and
> no promise whatsoever that any specific namespace happens to have all
> filesystems mounted somewhere in it...
Nothing beyond guesswork, since it's been a while since I've played
with LXC. In any case, I was struggling a bit for the correct
terminology.
Am I similarly off-base with regards to the chroot'd scenario?
chroot case is going to be reachable from namespace root, but I seriously
doubt that pathname relative to that will be more useful...
Again, relying on pathnames for forensics (or security in general) is
a serious mistake (cue unprintable comments about apparmor and similar
varieties of snake oil). And using audit as poor man's ktrace analog
is... misguided, to put it very mildly.