Re: [PATCH] Audit: EINTR instead of kernel private return codes in audit records
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 16:07:42 Eric Paris wrote:
It should be slightly faster <snip>
We would also be picking up ENOIOCTLCMD but that shoudln't be seen on
this code path, so I guess it doesn't matter.
Right, the note in the top of include/linux/errno.h says these should not be
seen by userspace. So, ENOIOCTLCMD is invalid if we ever saw it. But what
about the NFSv3 errnos (in the same file)? Do we need to worry about those?
Thanks,
-Steve