Re: Audit Parsing Library Requirements
On Friday 10 March 2006 14:25, LC Bruzenak wrote:
If not a bother would you mind listing the fields in the record or
point
me to a reference of what they are on your next spec?
We'll make that later in the project. I would need to spend some time going
over every single message. Amazingly, you can write a parser without knowing
what all is there since it all follows a well defined pattern.
-Steve