On 14/12/18, Valdis.Kletnieks(a)vt.edu wrote:
 On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:50:20 -0500, Eric Paris said:
 > On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 11:45 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks(a)vt.edu wrote:
 > > On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 20:09:54 -0500, Valdis Kletnieks said:
 > > > Spotted these two while booting single-user on 20141216.  20141208
 > > > doesn't throw these, so it's something in the last week or so..
 > >
 > > Gaah!  Turns out that 20141208 *is* susceptible - it had been booting
 > > just fine for several days, but it went around the bend, apparently due
 > > to a userspace or initrd change.
 >
 > $5 says you updated systemd?
 
 Actually, yeah.  yum.log says:
 
 Dec 12 14:08:09 Updated: systemd-218-1.fc22.x86_64
 
 and things started going downhill that evening.  Damned if I know what 218
 was doing to cause the issues.  (Other RPM update that looked vaguely
 related was for selinux-policy, but again, damned if I know what a policy
 file could contain that would change the behavior...)
 
 Is it worth backing it to -217, or do we have a handle on the issue and
 systemd is just the messenger? 
I've got a potential fix since the problem looks pretty obvious now.
This is stable branch material...
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs(a)redhat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545