On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 7:50 AM Paul Moore <paul(a)paul-moore.com> wrote:
These patches look fine to me, but it would be really nice to get an
ACK from the time folks before I merge this into audit/next. Time
folks, I know you've looked at previous versions of this patchset, can
you give this a quick look to make sure everything is still okay from
your perspective?
Sorry for the slow response. I briefly looked it over and it seems
simple enough, so don't really have any objections. Though I don't
have as sharp an eye (or opinion :) as Thomas, so no promises he won't
step in with an issue.
I do want to make sure folks are careful with future changes to
audit_log(), but that's my usual hand-wringing.
thanks
-john