On Friday, July 17, 2015 12:18:27 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On 15/07/16, Eric Paris wrote:
> I have to admit, I'm partial to not merging this (with the other
> patches). Changing object lifetimes in what i seem to remember is long
> standing code (auditfilter, not auditexe) seems to me like something we
> really would want to be git bisectable, not mushed with an unrelated
> feature addition. But it ain't my tree :)
So maybe even fixing this before applying the audit exe stuff has
merit...
No, let's get the exe filter stuff in now just so I can get all you guys off
my back about it :)
The refcnt stuff is almost surely going to get messy and I would just assume
not deal with that right now since it appears to be working. We have other
stuff we need to fix first.
--
paul moore
security @ redhat