On Tuesday, December 23, 2014 04:41:42 PM Paris, Eric wrote:
Me likie much more.
Yeah, me too.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Paul Moore <pmoore(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 23, 2014 01:02:04 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>> A regression was caused by commit 780a7654cee8:
>> audit: Make testing for a valid loginuid explicit.
>>
>> (which in turn attempted to fix a regression caused by e1760bd)
>>
>> When audit_krule_to_data() fills in the rules to get a listing, there was
>> a
>> missing clause to convert back from AUDIT_LOGINUID_SET to AUDIT_LOGINUID.
>>
>> This broke userspace by not returning the same information that was sent
>> and expected.
>>
>> The rule:
>> auditctl -a exit,never -F auid=-1
>>
>> gives:
>> auditctl -l
>>
>> LIST_RULES: exit,never f24=0 syscall=all
>>
>> when it should give:
>> LIST_RULES: exit,never auid=-1 (0xffffffff) syscall=all
>>
>> Tag it so that it is reported the same way it was set. Create a new
>> private flags audit_krule field (pflags) to store it that won't interact
>> with the public one from the API.
>>
>> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # v3.10-rc1+
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com>
>> ---
>>
>> include/linux/audit.h | 4 ++++
>> kernel/auditfilter.c | 10 ++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> Applied, thanks.
>
> --
> paul moore
> security @ redhat
--
paul moore
security @ redhat