On Tuesday, December 23, 2014 04:41:42 PM Paris, Eric wrote:
 Me likie much more. 
Yeah, me too.
 On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Paul Moore <pmoore(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
 > On Tuesday, December 23, 2014 01:02:04 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
 >> A regression was caused by commit 780a7654cee8:
 >>        audit: Make testing for a valid loginuid explicit.
 >> 
 >> (which in turn attempted to fix a regression caused by e1760bd)
 >> 
 >> When audit_krule_to_data() fills in the rules to get a listing, there was
 >> a
 >> missing clause to convert back from AUDIT_LOGINUID_SET to AUDIT_LOGINUID.
 >> 
 >> This broke userspace by not returning the same information that was sent
 >> and expected.
 >> 
 >> The rule:
 >>       auditctl -a exit,never -F auid=-1
 >> 
 >> gives:
 >>       auditctl -l
 >>       
 >>               LIST_RULES: exit,never f24=0 syscall=all
 >> 
 >> when it should give:
 >>               LIST_RULES: exit,never auid=-1 (0xffffffff) syscall=all
 >> 
 >> Tag it so that it is reported the same way it was set.  Create a new
 >> private flags audit_krule field (pflags) to store it that won't interact
 >> with the public one from the API.
 >> 
 >> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # v3.10-rc1+
 >> Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com>
 >> ---
 >> 
 >>  include/linux/audit.h |    4 ++++
 >>  kernel/auditfilter.c  |   10 ++++++++++
 >>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 > 
 > Applied, thanks.
 > 
 > --
 > paul moore
 > security @ redhat 
-- 
paul moore
security @ redhat