On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 9:16 AM Steve Grubb <sgrubb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hello,
Since this is a chat to discuss merging the user space piece, I trimmed the
recipients down to the audit community.
Good idea.
On Thursday, September 9, 2021 8:58:58 PM EDT Richard Guy Briggs
wrote:
> > I spent some time this morning/afternoon playing with the io_uring
> > audit filtering capability and with your audit userspace
> > ghau-iouring-filtering.v1.0 branch it appears to work correctly. Yes,
> > the userspace tooling isn't quite 100% yet (e.g. `auditctl -l` doesn't
> > map the io_uring ops correctly), but I know you mentioned you have a
> > number of fixes/improvements still as a work-in-progress there so I'm
> > not too concerned. The important part is that the kernel pieces look
> > to be working correctly.
>
> Ok, I have squashed and pushed the audit userspace support for iouring:
>
>
https://github.com/rgbriggs/audit-userspace/commit/e8bd8d2ea8adcaa758024cb
> 9b8fa93895ae35eea
>
https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-userspace/compare/master...rgbriggs:g
> hak-iouring-filtering.v2.1 There are test rpms for f35 here:
>
http://people.redhat.com/~rbriggs/ghak-iouring/git-e8bd8d2-fc35/
>
> userspace v2 changelog:
> - check for watch before adding perm
> - update manpage to include filesystem filter
> - update support for the uring filter list: doc, -U op, op names
> - add support for the AUDIT_URINGOP record type
> - add uringop support to ausearch
> - add uringop support to aureport
> - lots of bug fixes
>
> "auditctl -a uring,always -S ..." will now throw an error and require
> "-U" instead.
OK, now that the bug fix release is out of the way, let's start merging this
into user space. I think we should start with the code that let's auditd
write the record correctly and then the auditctl piece that inserts the rule
into the kernel. Those should be easy to merge.
I see one section of code that mirrors all of the operations in ioring.h. I
thought that Paul only wanted to audit some of the operations and not all of
them. Did that change? Are we really going to allow auditing reads on ioring?
Only certain io_uring operations are audited, you can see the patch
here in the selinux/next tree (look for the io_op_defs struct changes
and the "audit_skip" field):
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/selinux.git/commi...
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com