On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 11:19:44 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On 15/08/12, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 05:48:48 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > Do you plan to push this fix to next?
>
> Patience. Yes, I'll be pushing this to next sometime this week; as usual
> I'll send mail when I do.
Ok, no problem, I'm not rushing. I was unsure what your intentions were
or whether there was more to do to help it happen.
It's merged. I still don't know why I'm seeing that error, but the patch is
obviously correct so I'm just going to merge it anyway and chalk it up to some
compiler/sparse oddity.
As far as patch follow-ups, if you haven't heard back from me after four days
or so (yes, that is as arbitrary as it sounds), it isn't a bad idea to send a
follow-up, especially if it is a critical patch, to make sure I've seen the
patch (things do occasionally fall through the cracks). However, if it is
only been a day or two and I haven't responded, rest assured I've likely seen
your patch I'm just dealing with something else at the moment and haven't had
the time to review/comment/merge your patch.
--
paul moore
security @ redhat