On Wednesday 09 November 2005 18:02, Linda Knippers wrote:
I'm wondering about the usefulness of this message since it
doesn't
identify the watch that's being removed.
This denotes that a configuration change has occurred. This is needed.
If we need this message, shouldn't it identify the watch
that's being
removed?
That would be nice. In the new file system audit code, maybe we can add the
file name?
Thanks,
-Steve