Re: audit 1.2.2 released

On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 14:44 -0500, Michael C Thompson wrote: > Linda Knippers wrote: >> I'm running the .27 kernel and the 1.2.2 tools on an x86_64 >> (Xeon/EM64T) SMP box with the targeted policy in enforcing mode. >> I tried to reproduce the problem discussed yesterday (the very fist >> rule doesn't take and the rest do) but it seems to work fine on my >> system. > I've been running mostly on an i686 (Intel) with the .27 kernel and > 1.2.2 tools with the MLS policy. I've tested this on an x86_64 (AMD > opteron) and see this problem too. However, this problem does NOT exist > when using targeted policy, so it is most likely an MLS SELinux issue. > My MLS policy is 2.2.42 I've recently hit the same issue (or one that looks just like it[1]) on current FC-5 with targeted policy in permissive mode. [1] Program calls audit_log_user_message() at boot time, and gets -1 (EPERM) ... if you put a "for (int i = 1; i < 1; ++i)" in front of it, it returns 0.