On Monday, January 19, 2015 12:57:11 PM Jan Lieskovsky wrote:
Hello folks,
wasn't able to find answer to the following question in the auditctl
manual page, thus checking here - does the order / position in which the
auditctl's | /etc/audit/audit.rules' audit rule arguments are listed in
the rule matter or all permutations of the arguments are allowed?
Yes, its a first match wins system. I tell people to order from specific to
general. IOW, put a watch on /etc/shadow before a watch on /etc.
-Steve
IOW suppose the following rule:
-a always,exit -F path=/bin/ping -F perm=x -F auid>=500 -F
auid!=4294967295 -k privileged
Is
-a always,exit -F path=/bin/ping -F perm=x -F auid>=500 -F
auid!=4294967295 -k privileged
the only allowed form or are all the other possible argument permutations
[*] also valid / supported (under assumption there isn't some option
missing or some new option added of course when compared to the original
rule)?
Thank you && Regards, Jan.
--
Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Technologies Team
[*] For example suppose five different /etc/audit/audit.rules configurations
would use the forms as follows below - do all of them represent equivalent
requirement / setting? (regardless how much it's likely they would be
expressed in that form of)
-a always,exit -F path=/bin/ping -F perm=x -F auid>=500 -F auid!=4294967295
-k privileged -F path=/bin/ping -F perm=x -F auid>=500 -F auid!=4294967295
-k privileged -a always,exit -F perm=x -F auid>=500 -F auid!=4294967295 -k
privileged -a always, exit -F path/bin/ping -F auid>=500 -F
auid!=4294967295 -k privileged -a always,exit -F path=/bin/ping -F perm=x
-F auid!=4294967295 -k privileged -a always,exit -F path=/bin/ping -F
perm=x -F auid>=500 ..
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit