Re: FYI: 2.6.13.3 Memory leak, names_cache
On 10/7/05, Steve Grubb <sgrubb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Friday 07 October 2005 12:49, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
> Shouldn't this type of message be CCed to this list?
Offhand, I don't see the correlation between names_cache and audit
system.
Talked to Steve about this on IRC... For everyone else, read the rest
of the thread and you'll see that this was caused by audit syscall code.
:-Dustin
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 189 bytes)