Re: [RFC][PATCH] (#5) prelim auditfs

Chris, I wasn't really able to find much on the umount() problem the Inotify guys were having. I found a conversation / beat down which alluded to it, but that's it. Still, I hadn't actually tested the behavior when I umount a device that has watches on it, so I figured I'd at least do this test: I added watches to a mount, removed the mount, and saw all the watches putting back all their references and being freed / put back into their respective caches. This is the correct behavior in my book. Was it something more / different?