Re: [RFC][PATCH] (#7U4) file system auditing by location and name
On Saturday 07 May 2005 13:22, Steve Grubb wrote:
My current theory is that audit_watch_cache is NULL.
I've confirmed this is the problem. The patch I sent earlier will output a
message if watch_alloc is called and the cache pointer is NULL. I just
checked my logs and the message is there.
The audit system get started very early in the boot sequence. I think its the
first subsystem to get initted. So the question is when should this get
allocated? Should we do a lazy allocation? If so do we have any races to
worry about?
-Steve