On 4/26/2018 7:37 PM, Wajih Ul Hassan wrote:
 Thanks for your replies. However, I am now thinking of another
solution.
 Let's say I can capture write() in the userspace by either instrumenting the LibC or
LD_PRELOAD wrapper and store the string buffer passed to write().
 Can I call/generate *some other non-instrusive* syscall which can take that string buffer
that I stored earlier and that syscall with the buffer will be visible in the audit.log? I
am not worried about performance hit right now. 
I'm not 100% sure, but you might be able to do this with LandLock.
 On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 7:46 PM Casey Schaufler <casey(a)schaufler-ca.com
<mailto:casey@schaufler-ca.com>> wrote:
     On 4/26/2018 5:08 PM, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
     > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:40 PM, Casey Schaufler <casey(a)schaufler-ca.com
<mailto:casey@schaufler-ca.com>> wrote:
     >> On 4/26/2018 3:57 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
     >>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 20:34:57 +0000
     >>> Wajih Ul Hassan <wajih.lums(a)gmail.com
<mailto:wajih.lums@gmail.com>> wrote:
     >>>
     >>>> Hi all,
     >>>>  .....
     >> You could write a Linux Security Module (LSM) to monitor the
     >> content of writes. The performance impact would be rather
     >> amazing.
     >>
     > I would recommend using BPF + kprobes + perf_event buffers for this
     > purpose. There are enough places you can probe to grab these strings
     > in the kernel, and if you do your filtering in BPF, you can then push
     > it into kernel space based on filtering. Although, AFAIK, the BPF JITs
     > don't do vectorization of instructions, but it's still not too bad. If
     > you put your kprobe on the syscall itself, and probe the userspace
     > addr, remember you're going to be open to a time-of-use, time-of-check
     > style attack.
     That looks like a whole lot of mechanism to perform a simple task.