On 01/21/2015 07:54 AM, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
2015-01-21, 16:39:12 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:24:11AM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Wednesday, January 21, 2015 03:42:16 PM Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:05:39PM +0100, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
>>>> 2015-01-21, 04:36:38 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:01:26PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>>>> With this patch:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sys_mkdir .:40775 returned -17
>>>>>> sys_mkdir usr:40775 returned 0
>>>>>> sys_mkdir usr/lib:40775 returned 0
>>>>>> sys_mkdir usr/share:40755 returned 0
>>>>>> sys_mkdir usr/share/udhcpc:40755 returned 0
>>>>>> sys_mkdir usr/bin:40775 returned 0
>>>>>> sys_mkdir usr/sbin:40775 returned 0
>>>>>> sys_mkdir mnt:40775 returned 0
>>>>>> sys_mkdir proc:40775 returned 0
>>>>>> sys_mkdir root:40775 returned 0
>>>>>> sys_mkdir lib:40775 returned 0
>>>>>> sys_mkdir lib/modules:40775 returned 0
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and the problem is fixed.
>>>>
>>>> This patch also works for me.
>>>>
>>>>> ... except that it simply confirms that something's fishy with
>>>>> getname_kernel() of ->name of struct filename returned by
getname().
>>>>> IOW, I still do not understand the mechanism of breakage there.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not so sure about that. I tried to copy name to a new string in
>>>> do_path_lookup and that didn't help.
>>>>
>>>> Now, I've removed the
>>>>
>>>> putname(filename);
>>>>
>>>> line from do_path_lookup and I don't get the panic.
>>>
>>> That would indicate that somehow the refcount got unbalanced. Looking
>>> more closely it seems like the various audit_*() function do take a
>>> reference, but maybe that's not enough.
>>
>> I'm thinking the same thing and I think the problem may be that
>> __audit_reusename() is not bumping the filename->refcnt. Can someone who is
>> seeing this problem bump the refcnt in __audit_reusename()?
>>
>> struct filename *
>> __audit_reusename(const __user char *uptr)
>> {
>> struct audit_context *context = current->audit_context;
>> struct audit_names *n;
>>
>> list_for_each_entry(n, &context->names_list, list) {
>> if (!n->name)
>> continue;
>> if (n->name->uptr == uptr) {
>> + n->name->refcnt++;
>> return n->name;
>> }
>> }
>> return NULL;
>> }
>
> That doesn't seem to help, at least in my case.
Same here.
Well, it's probably not an audit issue. I tried audit=0 on the
commandline, and I just rebuilt a kernel with CONFIG_AUDIT=n, and it's
still panicing. This should have fixed any audit-related issue,
right?
I don't have audit enabled, so I don't think that is the problem either
(the refcount increase didn't help, and a WARN(1) added to the code
at the same location did not trigger).
Wonder if we have a use-after-free case and just have been lucky all along.
Guenter