On 9/28/06, Paul Jackson <pj(a)sgi.com> wrote:
How might this play with Paul Menage's <menage(a)google.com>
patch posted
earlier today on lkml:
[RFC][PATCH 0/4] Generic container system
I've not looked closely at Matt's patch, but I'm sure that there would
be no problems with hooking the container system to use task watchers
rather than patching fork.c/exit.c directly.
Paul