On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 07:43:18AM -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On 2017-03-22 12:11, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 03:05:36AM -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > Even though the skb->data pointer has been moved from the link layer
> > header to the network layer header, use the same method to calculate the
> > offset in ipv4 and ipv6 routines.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com>
> > ---
> > net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c b/net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c
> > index 4973cbd..cdb7cee 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c
> > @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static void audit_ip4(struct audit_buffer *ab, struct sk_buff
*skb)
> > struct iphdr _iph;
> > const struct iphdr *ih;
> >
> > - ih = skb_header_pointer(skb, 0, sizeof(_iph), &_iph);
> > + ih = skb_header_pointer(skb, skb_network_offset(skb), sizeof(_iph),
&_iph);
>
> This update is completely pointless.
Its point is to be consistent with audit_ip6() and to prevent further
time consumed by confusion and head-scratching. I know it is slightly
slower with an identical result.
> If you want I can place it in nf-next, your call.
I'd prefer to bring it through the audit-next tree to avoid the merge
conflict.
No problem. I remove this patchset from my patchwork then.