On 2018-03-12 11:53, Paul Moore wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Richard Guy Briggs
<rgb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On 2018-03-12 11:12, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 2:31 AM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>> > Audit link denied events for symlinks had duplicate PATH records rather
>> > than just updating the existing PATH record. Update the symlink's
PATH
>> > record with the current dentry and inode information.
>> >
>> > See:
https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/21
>> > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com>
>> > ---
>> > fs/namei.c | 1 +
>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> Why didn't you include this in patch 4/4 like I asked during the
>> previous review?
>
> Please see the last comment of:
>
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2018-March/msg00070.html
Yes, I just saw that ... I hadn't seen your replies on the v1 patches
until I had finished reviewing v2. I just replied to that mail in the
v1 thread, but basically you need to figure out what is necessary here
and let us know. If I have to figure it out it likely isn't going to
get done with enough soak time prior to the upcoming merge window.
Steve? I was hoping you could chime in here.
I'd just include it for completeness unless Steve thinks it will stand
on its own and doesn't want the overhead.
>> > diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
>> > index 50d2533..00f5041 100644
>> > --- a/fs/namei.c
>> > +++ b/fs/namei.c
>> > @@ -945,6 +945,7 @@ static inline int may_follow_link(struct nameidata
*nd)
>> > if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU)
>> > return -ECHILD;
>> >
>> > + audit_inode(nd->name, nd->stack[0].link.dentry, 0);
>> > audit_log_link_denied("follow_link",
&nd->stack[0].link);
>> > return -EACCES;
>> > }
>>
>> paul moore
>
> - RGB
paul moore
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com>
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635