So, here is the tree structure for auditd and audisp in Ubuntu.
*root@dns:/etc# ls -l audit/rules.d/*
*total 4*
*-rw-r----- 1 root root 373 Jan 18 2016 audit.rules*
*root@dns:/etc# *
*root@dns:/etc# ls -l audisp/*
*total 20*
*-rw-r----- 1 root root 211 Jan 18 2016 audispd.conf*
*-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1143 Jan 18 2016 audisp-prelude.conf*
*-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 714 Sep 16 13:51 audisp-remote.conf*
*drwxr-x--- 2 root root 4096 Sep 16 10:42 plugins.d*
*-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 246 Jan 18 2016 zos-remote.conf*
*root@dns:/etc# *
*root@dns:/etc# ls -l audisp/plugins.d/*
*total 20*
*-rw-r----- 1 root root 358 Jan 18 2016 af_unix.conf*
*-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 436 Jan 18 2016 audispd-zos-remote.conf*
*-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 280 Jan 18 2016 au-prelude.conf*
*-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 239 Sep 16 10:42 au-remote.conf*
*-rw-r----- 1 root root 453 Jan 18 2016 syslog.conf*
Noticed that /etc/audit has a subdirectory rules.d - which again has
another audit.rules. (the contents of that file are pasted below)
*cat /etc/audit/rules.d/audit.rules*
*# This file contains the auditctl rules that are loaded*
*# whenever the audit daemon is started via the initscripts.*
*# The rules are simply the parameters that would be passed*
*# to auditctl.*
*# First rule - delete all*
*-D*
*# Increase the buffers to survive stress events.*
*# Make this bigger for busy systems*
*-b 320*
*# Feel free to add below this line. See auditctl man page*
Best Regards,
Rituraj B
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 11:59 PM, Rituraj Buddhisagar <rituraj(a)vayana.com>
wrote:
Hi Steve,
As per the config file which I had sent (/etc/audit/audit.rules); below
line has root_action
*-a exit,always -S all -F euid=0 -F perm=wxa -F auid!=4294967295 -k
root_action*
I do not see root_action anywhere else in /etc/audit/* and /etc/audisp/*
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Rituraj B
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, September 23, 2017 10:08:40 AM EDT Rituraj Buddhisagar wrote:
> > Continued...from previous mail of mine..
> >
> > While I am reading and exploring much on auditd & on how I can have a
> > proper central system where logs are stored and daily reports get
> > generated, you might want to look at my config file on server and
> > suggest/recommend if anything - would appreciate if any pointers.
> >
> > I am using default config which came with Ubuntu 16.04 and only change
> was*
> > "-F auid!=4294967295"* on line where root_action is defined .
>
> There is no rule, root_action, that is shipped with the audit package. I
> would
> be interested in seeing it if you could copy and paste it into a reply.
>
> -Steve
>
> > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 7:30 PM, Rituraj Buddhisagar <
> rituraj(a)vayana.com>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Steve,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the response.
> > >
> > > Suppressing the events with -F auid!=4294967295 worked.
> > >
> > > I am seeing the events like "vi" "chmod" etc are
getting audited by
> the
> > > system - even as a root account.
> > >
> > > I am yet to understand fully though on various rule sets and also on
> > > components like audisp / audisp-remote. So reading more ..
> > >
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Rituraj B
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> On Friday, September 22, 2017 1:09:19 AM EDT Rituraj Buddhisagar
> wrote:
> > >> > I have a DNS server for which the auditd was generating lot of
> system
> > >>
> > >> calls
> > >>
> > >> > and flooding the logs.
> > >> > Due to this the server was under heavy memory usage as
> audisp-remote
> > >>
> > >> was
> > >>
> > >> > hogging the memory. The log output for audisp-remote showed that
> the
> > >> > syscall was 49. Then I got to know from ausyscall command that
the
> call
> > >> > number 49 corresponds to bind. Hence I have *excluded* the call
to
> > >>
> > >> "bind".
> > >>
> > >> > I have put in below line in the /etc/audit/audit.rules
> > >> >
> > >> > *-a exclude,always -S 49*
> > >> >
> > >> > I have put the above line before section 10.2.2 which says
"Feel
> free
> > >> > to
> > >> > add below this line" (please note I am running Ubuntu 14.04
but I
> > >>
> > >> suppose
> > >>
> > >> > auditd implementation is same across board) .
> > >>
> > >> Also know that the rules are looked at from top to bottom with the
> first
> > >> match
> > >> winning. So, you would want this rule above whatever is causing
> events.
> > >>
> > >> > After the exclusion - I no more see the syscall=49 line in
> > >> > /var/log/audit/audit.rules. So thats a success of sorts!
> > >> >
> > >> > *Probem/Issue/Query now*: After the exclusion, I do see audit
> events
> > >> > for
> > >> > cron , sudo etc. But I do not see a call for "vi" file
open mode
> etc.
> > >>
> > >> I'd need to see the rules to figure out what's wrong, but I
have some
> > >> hints
> > >> below...
> > >>
> > >> > *Background:*
> > >> >
> > >> > log output earlier which was flooding the logs and giving message
"
> > >>
> > >> *dns1
> > >>
> > >> > audisp-remote: message repeated 6613 times: [ queue is full -
> dropping
> > >> > event"*
> > >> >
> > >> > *log:*
> > >> > *type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1506025977.586:46629194): arch=c000003e
> > >>
> > >> syscall=49
> > >>
> > >> > success=yes exit=0 a0=3 a1=7ffe540ecf20 a2=c a3=0 items=0
> ppid=22337
> > >> > pid=22338 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0
egid=0
> > >>
> > >> sgid=0
> > >>
> > >> > fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="audisp-remote"
> > >> > exe="/sbin/audisp-remote" key="root_action"*
> > >>
> > >> The main question is what is the root_action rule(s)? Normally we
> add a
> > >> auid!=4294967295 to prevent daemons from causing events. Typically
> when
> > >> it's
> > >> desired to get root events, its means that you want to target
> _people_
> > >> running
> > >> as root rather than normal system activity.
> > >>
> > >> > root@dns1:/tmp# ausyscall 49
> > >> > *bind*
> > >> >
> > >> > I do see audit events for cron , sudo etc. But I do not see a
call
> for
> > >>
> > >> "vi"
> > >>
> > >> > file open mode etc.
> > >> >
> > >> > Observation: I open file /etc/audit/audit.rules in vi editor and
> then
> > >>
> > >> close
> > >>
> > >> > it. Audit log does not show syscall=2
> > >>
> > >> If you were wanting to record writes to that, you would use a rule
> like
> > >> this:
> > >>
> > >> -w /etc/audit/ -p wa
> > >>
> > >> > Earlier I used to see below output in logs, but I am not sure
that
> was
> > >>
> > >> for
> > >>
> > >> > which file opened in vi editor.
> > >> >
> > >> > *type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1506025995.825:46633170): arch=c000003e
> > >>
> > >> syscall=2
> > >>
> > >> > success=yes exit=3 a0=5598f609a210 a1=200c1 a2=81a0 a3=0 items=2
> > >>
> > >> ppid=21957
> > >>
> > >> > pid=22355 auid=1006 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0
sgid=0
> > >>
> > >> fsgid=0
> > >>
> > >> > tty=pts0 ses=361 comm="vi"
exe="/usr/bin/vim.basic"
> key="root_action"*
> > >>
> > >> Typically, its expected to look at events through ausearch. It
> groups the
> > >> records into events. You can also use aureport to see summary
> > >> information.
> > >>
> > >> > I did read a bit on auditd from below links. *Please let me know
> if I
> > >> > am
> > >> > missing something or are the calls getting audited in an expected
> way.*
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > I went through below links; *would appreciate if someone can help
> with
> > >>
> > >> any
> > >>
> > >> > references which are more lucid with example*s:
> > >> >
> > >> >
https://linux-audit.com/configuring-and-auditing-linux->
>>
> > >> systems-with-audit-da
> > >>
> > >> > emon/
> > >>
> > >> I was not aware of that site. But some of the information appears to
> be
> > >> dated.
> > >> For example, telling people to use pam_tally2 when they should be
> using
> > >> pam_faillock.
> > >>
> > >> >
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterp
> > >>
> > >> rise_Linux/6/ht
> > >>
> > >> > ml/Security_Guide/chap-system_auditing.html
> > >> >
> > >> > Furthermore, I would like to read much on audisp-remote to send
all
> > >>
> > >> these
> > >>
> > >> > logs to a central server. I do not find any documentation on
that.
> I
> > >> > see
> > >> > discussion on net where people are using rsyslog instead for
that.
> > >>
> > >> Please
> > >>
> > >> > help with references/links if any.
> > >>
> > >> Admittedly there is not much written. It is on my list of topics to
> blog
> > >> about. But I haven't had time for blogging lately.
> > >>
> > >> -Steve
>
>
>